Clinical Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention With Zotarolimus-Eluting Versus Biolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation Randomized Study

  • Kim, Byeong-Keuk
  • Shin, Dong-Ho
  • Hong, Myeong-Ki
  • Park, Hun Sik
  • Rha, Seung-Woon
  • ... Lee, Seung-Jin
  • 외 8명
Citations

WEB OF SCIENCE

247
Citations

SCOPUS

280

초록

Background-There have been no randomized studies comparing intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided versus conventional angiography-guided chronic total occlusion (CTO) intervention using new-generation drug-eluting stent Therefore, we conducted a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial designed to test the hypothesis that IVUS-guided CTO intervention is superior to angiography-guided intervention. Methods and Results-After successful guidewire crossing, 402 patients with CTOs were randomized to the IVUS-guided group (n=201) or the angiography-guided group (n=201) and secondarily randomized to Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents or Nobori biolimus-eluting stents. The primary and secondary end points were cardiac death and a major adverse cardiac event defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target-vessel revascularization, respectively. After 12-month follow-up, the rate of cardiac death was not significantly different between the IVUS-guided group (0%) and the angiography-guided group (1.0%; P by log-rank test=0.16). However, major adverse cardiac event rates were significantly lower in the IVUS-guided group than that in the angiography-guided group (2.6% versus 7.1%; P=0.035; hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.97). Occurrence of the composite of cardiac death or myocardial infarction was significantly lower in the IVUS-guided group (0%) than in the angiography-guided group (2.0%; P=0.045). The rates of target-vessel revascularization were not significantly different between the 2 groups. In the comparison between Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent and Nobori biolimus-eluting stent, major adverse cardiac event rates were not significantly different (4.0% versus 5.7%; P=0.45). Conclusions-Although IVUS-guided CTO intervention did not significantly reduce cardiac mortality, this randomized study demonstrated that IVUS-guided CTO intervention might improve 12-month major adverse cardiac event rate after new-generation drug-eluting stent implantation when compared with conventional angiography-guided CTO intervention.

키워드

coronary occlusiondrug-eluting stentsultrasonography, interventionalPERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTIONEXPERT CONSENSUS DOCUMENTNON-INFERIORITY TRIALMYOCARDIAL-INFARCTIONPROCEDURAL OUTCOMESARTERY STENOSESANGIOGRAPHYREGISTRYREVASCULARIZATIONRECANALIZATION
제목
Clinical Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention With Zotarolimus-Eluting Versus Biolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation Randomized Study
저자
Kim, Byeong-KeukShin, Dong-HoHong, Myeong-KiPark, Hun SikRha, Seung-WoonMintz, Gary S.Kim, Jung-SunKim, Je SangLee, Seung-JinKim, Hee-YeolHong, Bum-KeeKang, Woong-CholChoi, Jin-HoJang, Yangsoo
DOI
10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.002592
발행일
2015-07
유형
Article
저널명
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
8
7